As a parent who has survived a revolving door of crisis after crisis and of a child who was given a second chance at life by being allowed his right to admission into a Residential Habilitation Center, I write this letter with hopes and dreams but also with sadness. If one person’s life is saved by this, it’s worth it and I do know that I become a broken record – but it is necessary to be heard.
When our child lived at home we had no other life but trying to keep him safe and healthy. I was not able to attend any meetings or participate in advocacy beyond trying to work with DDD to approve the “allowed” services and support on the waiver he was on. After several years of fighting just to get him prescribed supplies (DDD denied them as ‘unnecessary”) I turned to The Arc. The Arc was no support at all – I was told to call my legislator. Well, as a parent in crisis, that recommendation seemed ridiculous (now I know different) but I think that someone from The Arc could have helped me – they had no interest in helping me or our son.
Up until then, I had assumed that The Arc and the other DD advocates really did have the best interest of those with Intellectual Disabilities (ID) in mind. I now know differently. I see the false advocacy and hidden agendas and mud slinging that is done in addition to the personal assaults and censorship that allowed. This letter will name specific people - a practice that I have realized that I need to do in order for them to have some accountability to our community.
Why aren’t these advocates held accountable to being responsible stewards of our public resources? They are failing us. It’s time that these folks answered questions and responded to inquiries, rather then writing personal attacks to and about the person who asks the questions. I would gladly discuss the issues with them or answer their questions about the research I have done or the data I have collected – they are not interested in even looking at though.
Developmental Disabilities Council
Please ask these people to:
1. Read the US DD Act
2. Read the 1999 US Supreme Court Decision Olmstead
3. Review the data regarding cost of care for people with high care support needs. (http://becausewecare1.com/2012/06/11/will-negligence-become-the-new-standard-of-care/)
4. Defend the research in the Report entitled “Assessment Findings for Persons with Developmental Disabilities Served in Residential Habilitation Centers and Community Settings” – also, if you know anyone who does any research, have them take a look at this and see if they can defend the author’s findings. Let me know what you find out.
5. Ask them if they understand the significance of the Support Intensity Scale and the DD Assessment which looks at activities of daily living. (http://becausewecare1.com/2012/06/09/to-the-arc-and-other-community-advocates-for-people-with-intellectual-disabilities/)
6. Have them review the non profits and financial statements which work with ID clients in our state
7. Have them look at the issues of, lack of stability and sustainability of our caregivers, which directly affects the health and safety of our loved ones. (http://becausewecare1.com/2012/06/14/how-can-we-have-stability-and-sustainability-with-up-to-45-staffing-turnover/)
I’m not interested in hearing the same rhetoric from The Arc Advocates and their constituents – that information is inaccurate and misleading. I’m interested in speaking with those who actually would like to know what the data means, where it came from and what it represents. Those in The Arc do not know this information. DRW does not know this information. Community Residential Service Association does not know this information.
It has been shared with all of these organizations but they will not acknowledge the information because it does not support their agenda.
I can say that I have appreciated conversations which I have had with Sue Elliott, Executive Director of The Arc of Washington. She has been candid and has indicated that yes, I am correct in stating that for those with high support needs the cost of care would be more expensive in community settings. The Arc, though, believes that no one should live in any congregate care and that is what they advocate for. It is fine to advocate for no congregate care but in so doing one also has to use accurate data and say that they do not agree with congregate care but it will cost more. They are not doing that – they are giving false information to support their advocacy. This is very detrimental to ALL with ID.
Please, I welcome questions and concerns. I would appreciate feedback and will get back to you. I have researched much of this data and have the public records and citations of all resources.
Please share with those who may need to know or understand this information or have them contact me. I would be very happy help anyone understand the complexities of caring for a person with ID who has very high support needs.