I am very disappointed with the Joint Position Statement published June 23, 2016 by The American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD) Association of University Centers on Disabilities (AUCD).
While there is quite a bit of quality information in this statement it is obviously clear that these organizations also have a strong bias against choice of residential settings. It is unfortunate that these organizations do not understand that congregate care is not the same as segregated care.
“Everyone with an intellectual or developmental disability deserves to live in the community where they have the opportunity to experience vibrant lives that include work, friends, family, and high expectations for community contributions.” These goals can and are also accomplished in congregate and campus type communities.
Many states have built systems that utilize group homes as a key way to support people in the community. When people find themselves in a situation where they need to live outside of their family home, they are often placed in an “open bed” versus being offered person-centered supports designed specifically to meet their needs. In many of these situations, people remain as isolated in these settings as they do in a large-scale institution. A process for creating and sustaining supports that make their living situation a home in a neighborhood is needed.
It is clear from the above statements that these organizations realize there is a problem with the funding and system that many supports are built around.
Yet AAIDD and AUCD are doing exactly what they chastise others for doing – categorically denying the individual the personal choice for individualized care in the residential setting they choose. The setting is not what necessarily causes the segregation – separation from familiy, friends and community causes segregation. Unfortunately that segregation can happen in any residential setting.
It is the segregation that needs to be called out – not the setting.